- Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw, LLP
- Dla Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP
- Shearman & Sterling LLP
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Llp
- County of Los Angeles
- Truck Underwriters Association
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
- Pulaski County
- Sidley Austin LLP
- Arnold & Porter LLP
- Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett MNP LLP
- Hyland Hills Park & Recreation
- Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
- Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP
- Alston & Bird LLP
- King & Spalding LLP
- Mayer Brown LLP
- Proskauer Rose LLP
- State Department of Justice
- Clifford Chance US LLP
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
- Winston & Strawn LLP
- Ropes & Gray LLP
- Day Pitney Foundation Inc
- Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP
- Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
- Goodwin Procter LLP
- Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
- Covington & Burling LLP
- Nixon Peabody LLP
- Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
- Jones Day
- Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, L.L.P.
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP
- Dechert LLP
- Kaye Scholer LLP
- Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- City of Los Angeles
- Perkins Coie LLP
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP
- Jenner & Block LLP
|
- Hunton & Williams LLP
- Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
- Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LL
- Kilpatrick Stockton LLP
- Baker & Botts, L.L.P.
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
- Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP
- C.T.corporation System
- Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, L.L.P.
- White & Case LLP
- Howrey LLP
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
- Bryan Cave LLP
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky
- Bingham McCutchen LLP
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy, LLP
- Williams & Connolly LLP
- Chadbourne & Parke LLP
- Reed Smith LLP
- Crowell & Moring LLP
- The Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Foundation
- Dewey & Leboeuf LLP
- Pepper Hamilton LLP
- Dewey Ballantine LLP
- Latham & Watkins LLP
- Ballard Spahr Andrew & Ingersoll, LLP
- County of Santa Clara
- McGuirewoods LLP
- Andrews Kurth LLP
- Hardin Schiff LLP
- Ice Miller LLP
- Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann LLP
- Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
- Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, LLP
- U. S. Legal Support, Inc.
- Quarles & Brady LLP
- Thompson Coburn LLP
- Parish of St Bernard
- Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan L.L.P.
- Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
- McDermott, Will & Emery LLP
- Patton Boggs LLP
- Greenberg Traurig LLP
- Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
- Baker & Mc Kenzie L.L.P.
- Lowenstein Sandler PC
- Arent Fox LLP
- Cozen O'Connor
|
|
The above list is compiled by ERI from available datasets either part of the public domain, survey permitted display, or leased from other vendors. Individual names are only from public domain data (source links provided). ERI does not necessarily utilize this data in any of its Assessor Series products or Salary Surveys; salary survey data is always anonymous (although participating organizations are shown in the Appendix of those reports). The semantic search is borrowed from ERI’s Nonprofit Comparables Assessor where boards of directors, employers, contractors, and contributors can be inter-related.
|
|
The Assessor Series® differentiates pay by 1,278 industries, 8,368 city/areas, any customized size (revenue, assets, employees), normalized to any date; ERI Salary Surveys and Abbott, Langer Association Surveys differentiate by industry, 2 revenue sizes and a data date of 31 March. Both use ERI’s enhanced Standard Industrial Classification codes (eSIC). Industry codes differ remarkably:
|
| Business is the making/selling of a product/service at a profit. |
| How? |
What? |
Why? |
| Activity Code/NAICS |
eSIC/SEC/SIC |
NTEE |
|
Example: The NAICS (North American Industrial Classification System) reclassifies fast food retailers’ SIC (what) into NAICS “manufacturing” categories (how). The nonprofit world uses NTEE, which focuses on “purpose” (why), few of which are profit focused (Form 990 data). Certain sources, such as the US SEC, use the traditional SIC codes (as they are not a “statistical agency” of the US Government and are not mandated to use the NAICS). To combine and compare, ERI maintains a consensus “eSIC” that allows crosswalks to SEC, UK/EU NACE codes, NAICS, IRS Form 990 NTEEs, and 23 other coding systems. In essence, ERI maintains and enhances the 1987 US SIC, just as it continues the Dictionary of Occupational Titles methodology (DOT) which was abandoned by the US Government in 1991, in the enhanced Dictionary of Occupational Titles (eDOT).
|
|
|
Privacy Policy Terms of Use
|
|
Copyright © 2013 ERI Economic Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. ERI Economic Research Institute is an Authorized User of selected Statistics Canada data under Agreement Number 6184. ERI’s intellectual property rights include Patent Nos. 6,862,596 and 7,647,322, "System and method for retrieving and displaying data, such as economic data relating to salaries, cost of living and employee benefits." Other Internet-related applications are Patents Pending.
|
|
|
ERI
and cost of living comparison software provide: salary data,
data,
free salary surveys,
,
canada information,
,
comparison guides,
comparisons,
ranges,
guide software,
data,
,
,
,
salary software,
salary surveys software,
,
,
a ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
compensation survey analyses,
2013 salary increases and 2014 salary structure guides,
wage survey salary information,
compensation surveys and wage surveys,
cost of living surveys for cost of living differentials,
and a for job analysis.
|
|
|
|
