- Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw, LLP
- Dla Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP
- Shearman & Sterling LLP
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Llp
- County of Los Angeles
- Truck Underwriters Association
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
- Pulaski County
- Sidley Austin LLP
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett MNP LLP
- Arnold & Porter LLP
- Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Hyland Hills Park & Recreation
- Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC
- Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
- Alston & Bird LLP
- King & Spalding LLP
- Clifford Chance US LLP
- Proskauer Rose LLP
- State Department of Justice
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
- Mayer Brown LLP
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
- Ropes & Gray LLP
- Winston & Strawn LLP
- Day Pitney Foundation Inc
- Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP
- Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
- Goodwin Procter LLP
- Nixon Peabody LLP
- Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
- Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
- Jones Day
- Covington & Burling LLP
- Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, L.L.P.
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP
- Dechert LLP
- Kaye Scholer LLP
- Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- City of Los Angeles
- Perkins Coie LLP
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP
- Jenner & Block LLP
|
- Hunton & Williams LLP
- Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
- Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LL
- Kilpatrick Stockton LLP
- Baker & Botts, L.L.P.
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
- Howrey LLP
- Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, L.L.P.
- C.T.corporation System
- Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP
- White & Case LLP
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
- Bryan Cave LLP
- Williams & Connolly LLP
- Chadbourne & Parke LLP
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy, LLP
- Bingham McCutchen LLP
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky
- Reed Smith LLP
- Crowell & Moring LLP
- The Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Foundation
- Dewey & Leboeuf LLP
- Pepper Hamilton LLP
- Dewey Ballantine LLP
- Latham & Watkins LLP
- Ballard Spahr Andrew & Ingersoll, LLP
- County of Santa Clara
- McGuirewoods LLP
- Andrews Kurth LLP
- Hardin Schiff LLP
- Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
- Ice Miller LLP
- Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann LLP
- Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, LLP
- U. S. Legal Support, Inc.
- Quarles & Brady LLP
- Thompson Coburn LLP
- Parish of St Bernard
- Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan L.L.P.
- Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
- McDermott, Will & Emery LLP
- Patton Boggs LLP
- Irell & Manella LLP
- CCH Legal Information Services Inc
- Lowenstein Sandler PC
- Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP
- Greenberg Traurig LLP
- Cozen O'Connor
- Baker & Mc Kenzie L.L.P.
|
|
The above list is compiled by ERI from available datasets either part of the public domain, survey permitted display, or leased from other vendors. Individual names are only from public domain data (source links provided). ERI does not necessarily utilize this data in any of its Assessor Series products or Salary Surveys; salary survey data is always anonymous (although participating organizations are shown in the Appendix of those reports). The semantic search is borrowed from ERI’s Nonprofit Comparables Assessor where boards of directors, employers, contractors, and contributors can be inter-related.
|
|
The Assessor Series® differentiates pay by 1,278 industries, 8,368 city/areas, any customized size (revenue, assets, employees), normalized to any date; ERI Salary Surveys and Abbott, Langer Association Surveys differentiate by industry, 2 revenue sizes and a data date of 31 March. Both use ERI’s enhanced Standard Industrial Classification codes (eSIC). Industry codes differ remarkably:
|
| Business is the making/selling of a product/service at a profit. |
| How? |
What? |
Why? |
| Activity Code/NAICS |
eSIC/SEC/SIC |
NTEE |
|
Example: The NAICS (North American Industrial Classification System) reclassifies fast food retailers’ SIC (what) into NAICS “manufacturing” categories (how). The nonprofit world uses NTEE, which focuses on “purpose” (why), few of which are profit focused (Form 990 data). Certain sources, such as the US SEC, use the traditional SIC codes (as they are not a “statistical agency” of the US Government and are not mandated to use the NAICS). To combine and compare, ERI maintains a consensus “eSIC” that allows crosswalks to SEC, UK/EU NACE codes, NAICS, IRS Form 990 NTEEs, and 23 other coding systems. In essence, ERI maintains and enhances the 1987 US SIC, just as it continues the Dictionary of Occupational Titles methodology (DOT) which was abandoned by the US Government in 1991, in the enhanced Dictionary of Occupational Titles (eDOT).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy Policy Terms of Use
|
|
|
Copyright © 2010 ERI Economic Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. ERI Economic Research Institute is an Authorized User of selected Statistics Canada data under Agreement Number 6184. ERI’s intellectual property rights include Patent Nos. 6,862,596 and 7,647,322, "System and method for retrieving and displaying data, such as economic data relating to salaries, cost of living and employee benefits." Other Internet-related applications are Patents Pending.
|
|
|
ERI
and cost of living comparison software provide: salary data,
data,
free salary surveys,
,
canada information,
,
comparison guides,
comparisons,
ranges,
guide software,
data,
,
,
,
salary software,
salary surveys software,
,
,
a ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
compensation survey analyses,
2009 salary increases and 2010 salary structure guides,
wage survey salary information,
compensation surveys and wage surveys,
cost of living surveys for cost of living differentials,
and a for job analysis.
|
|
|
|
